You are not logged in.

Rotors vs. Popups

Dear visitor, welcome to SPRINKLER TALK FORUM - You Got Questions, We've Got Answers. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains how this page works. You must be registered before you can use all the page's features. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

Jefe09

Starting Member

Posts: 1

1

Monday, May 1st 2006, 10:59am

Rotors vs. Popups

<font face="Lucida Console"></font id="Lucida Console"><font size="2"></font id="size2"><font color="green"></font id="green"> We getting ready to put a sprinkler system in our yard and had a professional landscaper draw out our sprinkler placement. In our backyard, we will have a rectangular shaped space approximately 49' x 82'. The lanscaper only drew in 6 rotors (3 across the border of the two largest sides). We would need the commercial grade rotors (45-50' radius) to get head-to-head coverage.

Our question is: will this work well? We don't want issues with dry patches or lousy coverage, but this simplified sprinkler layout would be great if it works. Or would it be better to install 24 popups? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

DOORZ

Advanced Member

Posts: 54

2

Monday, May 1st 2006, 2:47pm

Rotors work well for covering large areas, if you are concerned about dry patches, just make sure you have head to head coverage.

SprinklerGuy

Supreme Member

Posts: 358

3

Tuesday, May 2nd 2006, 2:27am

It takes serious GPM (gallons per minute) to get a lawn head to go 50 feet...and that is what you would need.

Ask your contractor what his plans are...the heads need to reach each other...and in order for them to reach eachother they will over spray the way you are set up....I would ask your contractor some questions....and do some research yourself...post his answers here.
Sprinkler Solutions, Inc.
Arizona and Colorado
www.sprinklersolutions.net

Tom

Supreme Member

Posts: 306

4

Tuesday, May 2nd 2006, 9:41am

I'd use 12 heads

Wet_Boots

Supreme Member

Posts: 4,102

Location: Metro NYC

5

Tuesday, May 2nd 2006, 12:41pm

You need coverage more than you need head-to-head coverage. If the heads are seeing around 50 psi, and the layout allows the heads to be located right on the edge of the area being watered, the need for head-to-head spacing isn't absolute. Even a tree or two wouldn't prevent six heads from covering that rectangle.

There are so many times that one or more details (water pressure, uneven boundaries, too many trees) are unknown, that head-to-head spacing becomes a 'safety net' ~ It isn't that the practice is mandatory, it's just good insurance.

Tom

Supreme Member

Posts: 306

6

Tuesday, May 2nd 2006, 2:13pm

true- but, head-to-head provides a more uniform coverage of water. also, many rotors don't water close into the head very well- so its nice to have other heads over lapping each other.

Wet_Boots

Supreme Member

Posts: 4,102

Location: Metro NYC

7

Tuesday, May 2nd 2006, 4:18pm

It's nice, but nice isn't necessary. Is there any professional reading this who would install an additional head for each tree that gets in the way of one head reaching the next head? A modern sprinkler head with sufficient pressure will cover the ground, from nozzle to the end of the arc. Old-time sprinkling, with low water pressures, was another matter entirely. I saw ancient Toro flat-top 602 heads dropping all their water about 30 feet away. Head-to-head spacing was the only way they could get the job done. If an installer doesn't bother with knowing his water supply, he may be in a similar situation. A capable installer places heads where they get the job done.

Tom

Supreme Member

Posts: 306

8

Wednesday, May 3rd 2006, 5:47am

Jefe didn't mention anything about trees. He did mention thou that he did not want issues with dry patches and lousy coverage. So I'm thinking 6 rotors is not doing him or his lawn any good

Wet_Boots

Supreme Member

Posts: 4,102

Location: Metro NYC

9

Wednesday, May 3rd 2006, 8:00am

You don't know how six rotors will do, since you can't see the site, or know the water supply. I can't either. At some point, the homeowner either has some faith in the installer's ability, or doesn't. I do know of plenty of installs on rectangles like the one described, with standard rotors, that only have six heads, and with adequate operating pressure, there are no dry areas. If anyone were to 'inform' the homeowner that the design is inadequate, and more pipe and heads must be installed, the homeowner would never go for it, since the lawn is already one hundred percent covered. There are other layouts for a 50x80 rectangle that would work on lower pressures, that would still require less than a dozen heads.

Head-to-head spacing is fine, but to insist it is mandatory is simply not living in the real world.

SprinklerGuy

Supreme Member

Posts: 358

10

Wednesday, May 3rd 2006, 11:39am

It is mandatory on all the installs I perform for my clients and that is all I care about.

It also depends on soil type and climate..you are asking for trouble in Phoenix, Arizona if you do not have head to head coverage, whereas here in Colorado Springs, I have seen tons of yards w/out head to head coverage do just fine.....
Sprinkler Solutions, Inc.
Arizona and Colorado
www.sprinklersolutions.net
Rate this thread